Family Law Attorney in Santa Clarita 

Walking into family court for the first time can feel unfamiliar and overwhelming. The courtroom environment and procedures are often new to people who have never participated in the legal process before. Many individuals are unsure what is expected of them, how they should prepare ahead of time, or how they should present themselves and their case during a hearing.

Understanding the structure of a family court hearing and preparing in advance can help reduce some of that uncertainty. While each case is different, knowing what typically occurs during a hearing allows the parties involved to approach the process with greater clarity and confidence.

Before attending a court hearing, it is often helpful to consult with an experienced family law attorney. An attorney can explain the legal issues involved, prepare the documents necessary for the proceeding, and provide guidance about how information should be presented to the court. Legal representation also ensures that someone is present to advocate on your behalf and address legal issues that may arise during the hearing.

Family Court Hearings in California

In California family law cases, many issues are addressed through a Request for Order (RFO) hearing. An RFO allows a party to ask the court to make temporary or permanent decisions regarding issues such as child custody, visitation, child support, spousal support, or property-related matters.

These hearings are typically brief compared to a full trial. Most hearings last approximately twenty to thirty minutes, however the exact length may vary depending on the court’s calendar and the complexity of the issues involved.

When a case is called the court will usually refer to the matter by the parties’ last name, for example Miller v. Miller. Both parties will approach the table in front of the judge, with the person who filed the Request for Order generally speaking first. That party will explain what orders they are requesting and the reasons those requests are being made. The other party is then given an opportunity to respond.

Judges often ask questions during these hearings to clarify facts or better understand the parties’ positions. Because hearings move quite quickly, it is important for each party to focus on the key issues and respond clearly and respectfully to the court’s questions.

Unlike a trial, most Request for Order hearings do not involve live witness testimony or extensive questioning. Instead, the judge primarily relies on the written declarations or other supporting documentation that were filed with the court prior to the hearing. For that reason, the written materials submitted to the court often play a central role in how the judge evaluates the issues presented.

Court Scheduling and Delays

Family courts frequently manage large calendars with many cases scheduled on the same day. As a result, hearings do not always begin at the exact time listed on the notice of hearing.

For example, even if a hearing is scheduled for 8:30a.m., it may not be called until later in the morning or early afternoon. Delays can occur when earlier cases take longer than expected or when the court needs additional time to address other matters on the calendar.

Because of this, individuals appearing in family court should generally plan to spend a significant portion of the day at the courthouse. Arriving early can help ensure that there is enough time to check in with the courtroom clerk or bailiff before the calendar begins.

Some courts also allow remote appearances for certain hearings either through video or telephone platforms. Availability of these options varies by county and by the type of hearing involved, so it is important to confirm whether remote participation is permitted in a particular case.

Unless specifically ordered by the court, children are typically not expected to attend family court hearings.

Preparing Documents and Evidence

Organization is an important part of preparing for any court hearing. Bringing well-organized documents allows parties to quickly reference important information if the judge asks questions during the hearing.

Many individuals choose to bring a folder or binder containing copies of their relevant paperwork. It is generally helpful to have at least three copies of important documents; one for personal reference, one for the court, and one for the other party or their attorney.

The types of documents that may be relevant depend on the issues involved in the hearing.

In matters involving child custody or visitation, helpful documents could include school records, medical information, attendance reports, report cards, and communications between parents such as text messages or emails. Photographs or other materials that reflect a parent’s involvement in the child’s life may also be relevant in certain circumstances.

In hearings involving financial issues, parties may find it helpful to bring documents such as tax returns, recent pay stubs, bank statements, credit card statements, property records, and documentation related to loans or leases. These materials can help provide the court with a clearer understanding of the parties’ financial circumstances.

When financial issues are before the court, parties are often required to complete an Income and Expense Declaration (FL-150.) This form requires the disclosure of income, expenses, assets, and debts. Providing the court with complete and accurate financial information is important because the court relies on these disclosures to make decisions related to support or other financial matters.

Courtroom Conduct and Professionalism

How individuals present themselves in court can influence the overall tone of the hearing. Judges frequently observe not only the substance of each party’s request but also how each person communicates with the court and with the other party.

Maintaining a respectful demeanor throughout the hearing is important. Parties should wait until they are given an opportunity to speak, listen carefully to the judge’s questions, and address the court as “Your Honor.”

Interrupting the judge or speaking over another party can disrupt the hearing and may create an unfavorable impression. Remaining calm and respectful, even during difficult discussions, helps maintain professionalism in the courtroom.

Appropriate Courtroom Attire

Court appearances are formal legal proceedings, and clothing should reflect the seriousness of the setting. Business or business-casual attire is generally appropriate for family court hearings.

Clothing that is overly casual, revealing, or distracting may not convey the level of professionalism expected in a courtroom environment. A neat and modest appearance helps demonstrate respect for the court and the legal process.

Communicating with the Court

In many hearings, the judge may give each party an opportunity to briefly explain their request. When speaking to the court, it is generally helpful to focus on clear and concise points rather than lengthy explanations.

Effective statements typically identify the person speaking, describe the order being requested, and explain why the request is reasonable or appropriate under the circumstances. When children are involved, courts focus heavily on the best interests of the child, so statements should emphasize facts that relate to the child’s well-being.

Judges generally respond best to factual explanations rather than personal accusations or emotional arguments. Focusing on the relevant issues before the court helps ensure that the judge receives the information necessary to evaluate the request.

Emotional Considerations

Family law cases often involve deeply personal matters such as parenting arrangements, finances, and changes to family structure. It is therefore common for individuals to feel anxious or emotional when attending court.

Although these reactions are understandable, maintaining composure during the hearing is often beneficial. Judges frequently evaluate how each party approaches conflict and whether they appear capable of addressing issues constructively.

In cases involving children, the court may also observe how each parent communicates and whether they appear willing to cooperate when necessary. Demonstrating patience, respect, and focus during the hearing can help reinforce that the party is approaching the matter thoughtfully.

Final Thoughts

A first family court hearing can set the tone for the remainder of a case. Being organized, prepared, and respectful during the process helps ensure that the court receives clear information about the issues involved.

However, navigating court procedures, deadlines, and legal requirements can feel overwhelming for individuals who are unfamiliar with the family law system. Working with an experienced family law attorney can help ensure that documents are properly prepared and that the case is presented clearly to the court.

At the Law Offices of Steven B. Chroman, P.C., we assist clients throughout every stage of the family law process. From preparing filings to organizing supporting documents and guiding clients through court appearances, our office works to help individuals approach their cases with clarity and confidence. If you have questions about an upcoming family court hearing or need assistance with your matter, contact our office at (661) 255-1800 or email office@chromanlaw.com to schedule a consultation.

This post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please call our office to schedule a consultation at (661)-255-1800.

The very last thing most couples want to think about while planning a wedding is the financial side of marriage, particularly planning for the possibility that a marriage may end. Most conversations focus on venues, invitations, flowers, guest lists, and outfits. Money usually isn’t part of the excitement, so it gets pushed aside. Financial planning can feel unromantic and complicated, and is often delayed or avoided altogether.

Despite this, financial issues play a significant role in nearly every part of a marriage. Decisions about income, property, debt, and long-term financial responsibility affect daily life and future stability. Addressing these issues before marriage allows couples to establish clarity and reduce uncertainty. For many couples, working through a prenuptial agreement is simply one way to have those conversations early and clearly.

Prenuptial Agreements

A prenuptial agreement is a written contract signed by two parties prior to marriage. It sets forth how certain financial matters will be addressed in the event the marriage ends by divorce or death. Prenuptial agreements commonly address the division of property, responsibility for debts, and the issue of spousal support.

Every prenuptial agreement looks different because every couple’s situation is different. That said, the purpose is to define financial rights and obligations in advance rather than leaving those determinations solely to state law. Most prenuptial agreements begin with disclosure of each party’s assets and debts. This usually includes bank accounts, retirement funds, real estate, investments, valuable personal property, and existing debts.

A prenuptial agreement may also address how certain property will be treated during the marriage, not just upon divorce. In some cases, couples include provisions related to practical matters, such as responsibility for pets.

However, a prenuptial agreement cannot determine issues of child custody or child support. Those issues are reserved for the court and must be decided based on the best interests of the child at the time of separation or dissolution.

California’s Default Prenup

Absent a valid prenuptial agreement, California couples already have a default set of rules. California is a community property state, meaning that, in general, assets and debts acquired during the marriage are divided equally upon divorce.

As a result, the California Family Code effectively establishes default financial outcomes for married couples who do not enter into a prenuptial agreement. These outcomes may not reflect the parties’ individual expectations or financial circumstances. A prenuptial agreement gives couples the ability to adjust those rules instead of relying on a one-size-fits-all system.

Addressing the Stigma Around Prenups

Prenuptial agreements frequently face two misconceptions: that prenups are only for wealthy or high-profile couples, and that signing one means a couple expects the marriage to fail. Neither assumption accurately reflects the purpose or function of prenuptial agreements.

Prenups are not just for celebrities or people with significant wealth. Prenuptial agreements are available to couples across a wide range of financial situations. They may be particularly useful where the parties enter the marriage with unequal assets, own real property, operate a business or professional practice, expect future inheritances, carry significant debt, or have children from prior relationships. A prenuptial agreement allows couples to define what fairness looks like for them, rather than relying entirely on default legal rules. There is no single profile for someone who “needs” a prenup.

The idea that a prenup signals a lack of commitment is also misplaced. In practice, creating a prenuptial agreement requires couples to talk openly about finances. Those conversations can be uncomfortable, but they are often necessary. A prenup does not plan for divorce. Instead, it documents agreements made when both people are communicating clearly and making decisions together.

For many couples, a prenup strengthens communication rather than undermines it. The process of negotiating a prenup often requires detailed discussions. Avoiding financial conversations altogether can create confusion or resentment later on. Addressing these issues early helps couples start their marriage with clearer expectations.

Requirements for Prenuptial Agreements

Creating a prenuptial agreement generally starts with clarifying the financial goals the parties want the agreement to address and identifying areas where they may wish to deviate from California’s default rules. This requires thoughtful discussion about how finances will be handled during the marriage and in the event it ends. Open communication between future spouses is critical, and some couples find it helpful to work with a counselor to support those conversations.

California law imposes specific requirements for prenuptial agreements to be enforceable. Each party must provide full and fair disclosure of their financial circumstances. In addition, each party must be represented by independent legal counsel or execute a written waiver of that right. These requirements are intended to reduce the risk of coercion and ensure that both parties understand the legal consequences of the agreement. Failure to comply with these statutory safeguards can render a prenuptial agreement unenforceable.

Prospective spouses considering a prenuptial agreement should also take sufficient time to review and negotiate its terms. Agreements signed under pressure or without adequate opportunity for review may be subject to later challenge.

Postnuptial Agreements

For couples who are already married and did not execute a prenuptial agreement, a postnuptial agreement may be an alternative. A postnup is entered into at any point during the marriage and can address many of the same financial issues as a prenup.

Postnuptial agreements are often used when circumstances change during a marriage, such as the acquisition of significant assets, receipt of an inheritance, or significant changes in income. As with prenuptial agreements, postnuptial agreements must meet statutory requirements to be enforceable.

Final Thoughts

Marital agreements, whether prenuptial or postnuptial, serve as tools for financial planning and risk management. When properly drafted, they can clarify expectations, reduce future disputes, and provide a framework tailored to the parties’ circumstances rather than relying solely on default statutory rules.

While discussing finances before or during a marriage may be uncomfortable, those discussions are often necessary to ensure informed decision-making. Clear agreements reached in advance can help reduce uncertainty and conflict in the future.

If you are considering a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, the Law Offices of Steven B. Chroman can assist you in navigating the legal requirements and drafting an agreement that reflects your circumstances. Contact our office at (661) 255-1800 or email office@chromanlaw.com to schedule a consultation.

This post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please call our office to schedule a consultation at (661) 255-1800.

California family law doesn’t stay the same for long. Laws are passed every year that change how courts handle divorce, custody, and domestic violence cases. In 2026, three major updates will kick in. They’re meant to make the system more responsive to safety concerns and the real-world challenges families deal with in court.

Together, these changes create two themes: making divorce easier when both sides agree, and making the rules around firearms and domestic violence even tighter.

Joint Divorce Filings

Right now, divorce in California starts with one spouse filing and then serving the other. Even if both people agree it’s over, the law still makes them go through that extra step. It adds time, money, and a lot of formality to something that doesn’t always need it.

Starting January 1, 2026, Senate Bill 1427 (SB 1427) changes that. Couples who both agree can file a joint petition for divorce or legal separation. Filing together means no one has to serve the other and both parties are treated as if they’ve already appeared in the case.

That doesn’t mean the road will always stay smooth. If disagreements pop up later, either spouse can cancel the joint petition and move back into the traditional process. SB 1427 simply gives couples who are on the same page a direct path forward. Less paperwork. Fewer delays. And the option to fall back on the old system if things don’t stay cooperative.

Firearm Exemptions in DVRO Cases

In California, the law requires that anyone subject to a domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) usually has to give up their firearms. In the past, however, courts have granted exemptions for work-related reasons, such as for those who are peace officers or security personnel, sometimes allowing continued possession for purposes of employment.

Starting January 1, 2026, Assembly Bill 2759 (AB 2759) makes those exceptions much harder to get. From now on, an exemption can only be granted if the person isn’t already prohibited under state or federal law from owning a gun in the first place.

The law also raises the standard for peace officers. It now applies specifically to sworn peace officers, and courts have to make two findings before granting an exemption:

• The officer’s personal safety depends on carrying a firearm outside of work hours

• The officer doesn’t pose an added threat to the protected party or the public.

For other jobs that require carrying a firearm, exemptions are still possible, but only if reassignment isn’t an option and the court finds no extra risk. And even then, any exemption has to be reviewed when a permanent restraining order is issued and again if it’s renewed.

AB 2759 makes it clear that safety comes first. Employment needs can’t outweigh the risk of putting firearms back into the hands of someone under a DVRO.

Domestic Violence, Custody, and Firearms

Custody disputes involving domestic violence are guided by Family Code § 3044. The law says there’s a presumption against giving custody to a parent with a history of abuse. Judges could already look at whether that parent had violated firearm restrictions under Family Code § 6389 when deciding if the presumption should stand.

Starting January 1, 2026, Senate Bill 899 (SB 899) makes the review even broader. Courts can now also consider firearm violations under Code of Civil Procedure § 527.9 and Penal Code § 18120.

This essentially means that judges will now have a wider lens to evaluate whether a parent who’s committed domestic violence should be trusted with custody, specifically when firearms are involved. SB 899 strengthens California’s stance that child safety in custody matters always comes first. By expanding the scope of firearm violations courts must weigh, the law doubles down on protecting children in custody disputes where domestic violence is already a factor.

Final Thoughts

The family law changes coming in 2026 clearly show that California is trying to make the family law system more efficient and secure. These reforms aren’t necessarily about adding more rules for the sake of it. They remove significant barriers where cooperation exists and add safeguards where danger does. It’s California’s latest step toward a family law system that better matches the realities families face every day.

If you have questions about how these California family law updates may affect your case, the Law Offices of Steven B. Chroman is here to help. Contact our office today at (661)-255-1800 or email office@chromanlaw.com to schedule a consultation.

This post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please call our office to schedule a consultation at (661)-255-1800.